CODA — globalised salary run (booked total + its details)
A globalisation: one booked salary total of 3 000.00 (detail number 0000) followed by the two individual salaries behind it (0001, 0002). Only the total is booked — a parser that sums the details too double-counts the file, and the statement stops balancing. Closes on a debit balance of 2 000.00.
CODA 2.8 — Valid
A globalisation: one booked salary total of 3 000.00 (detail number 0000) followed by the two individual salaries behind it (0001, 0002). Only the total is booked — a parser that sums the details too double-counts the file, and the statement stops balancing. Closes on a debit balance of 2 000.00.
What this file shows
A globalisation: one booked salary total of 3 000.00 (detail number 0000) followed by the two individual salaries behind it (0001, 0002). Only the total is booked — a parser that sums the details too double-counts the file, and the statement stops balancing. Closes on a debit balance of 2 000.00.
| Transactions | 3 |
|---|---|
| Date in the file | 2026-07-12 |
Every party, IBAN and amount below is fictitious. The IBANs are structurally valid — they pass the mod-97 check — but they belong to no real account.
File content
0000012072600005 CODA000002ACME BELGIUM NV GEBABEBB 00123456789 00000 2
12001BE68539007547034 EUR0000000001000000110726ACME BELGIUM NV ZICHTREKENING 001
2100010000REF0000000000000000011000000003000000120726101050000SALARIES JULY 2026 12072600110 0
2100010001REF0000000000000000011000000001200000120726501050000SALARY A DUPONT 12072600100 0
2100010002REF0000000000000000011000000001800000120726501050000SALARY B JANSSENS 12072600110 0
8001BE68539007547034 EUR1000000002000000120726 0
9 000005000000003000000000000000000000 2
How we know these results hold
Every file in this library is run through the site's own validator on each build. The expected result stated above is asserted by an automated test — if a file stopped matching what this page claims, the build would fail. Two inherited fixtures were repaired this way before publication: three IBANs failed the mod-97 check and several names used characters outside the basic SEPA character set.
CODA statement (Belgium)
- CODA — Belgian statement with a valid structured communication
- CODA — wrong mod-97 check digits and a statement that does not balance
- CODA — Belgian OGM (+++…+++) and ISO 11649 RF reference, both checksummed
- CODA — separate application: balances zeroed by design (§7.2.1)
- CODA — old balance ± movements ≠ new balance