ValidateFin

CODA — wrong mod-97 check digits and a statement that does not balance

Broken on purpose. The structured communication ends in 94 where mod 97 requires 93 — the single most common reason a Belgian payment is never matched to its invoice — and the new balance does not follow from the movements. No other free CODA tool checks these check digits.

CODA 2.8 — Valid

Broken on purpose. The structured communication ends in 94 where mod 97 requires 93 — the single most common reason a Belgian payment is never matched to its invoice — and the new balance does not follow from the movements. No other free CODA tool checks these check digits.

CODA statement (Belgium) CODA 2.8 CODA — FebelfinExpected result: Valid — 2 warnings

What this file shows

Broken on purpose. The structured communication ends in 94 where mod 97 requires 93 — the single most common reason a Belgian payment is never matched to its invoice — and the new balance does not follow from the movements. No other free CODA tool checks these check digits.

Transactions3
Date in the file2026-07-12

The defects it carries

  • CODA-BALAccount BE68539007547034: old balance ± movements (2160.1) ≠ new balance (2160).
  • CODA-OGMMovement 0001/0000: the structured communication +++090/9337/55494+++ fails its mod-97 check digits.

Quoted verbatim from the validator, not paraphrased.

Last verified: License: CC-BY-4.0

Every party, IBAN and amount below is fictitious. The IBANs are structurally valid — they pass the mod-97 check — but they belong to no real account.

File content

0000012072600005        CODA000003ACME BELGIUM NV           GEBABEBB   00123456789 00000                                       2
12001BE68539007547034                  EUR0000000001000000110726ACME BELGIUM NV           ZICHTREKENING                      001
2100010000REF0000000000000000011000000000250000120726001010001101090933755494                                      12072600100 0
2100020000REF0000000000000000021000000000089900120726004002000BANCONTACT SHOP 4471                                 12072600100 0
2100030000REF0000000000000000030000000001500000120726001500000INVOICE 2026-0042                                    12072600100 0
8001BE68539007547034                  EUR0000000002160000120726                                                                0
9               000005000000000339900000000001500000                                                                           2

How we know these results hold

Every file in this library is run through the site's own validator on each build. The expected result stated above is asserted by an automated test — if a file stopped matching what this page claims, the build would fail. Two inherited fixtures were repaired this way before publication: three IBANs failed the mod-97 check and several names used characters outside the basic SEPA character set.

CODA statement (Belgium)